Sunday, April 13, 2025

Please Pray 🙏 for Missionary Josh Sullivan, Missionary to South Africa KIDNAPPED. PRAY FOR HIS IMMEDIATE RELEASE.



CTTO

THE GREAT COMMISSION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH JOIN IN PRAYER FOR HIS IMMEDIATE RELEASE.

RELATED NEWS:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/US/american-missionary-reportedly-kidnapped-gunpoint-south-africa-church/story%3fid=120764034


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/us-pastor-josh-sullivan-abducted-gunpoint-sermon-south-africa/


https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/us-pastor-josh-sullivans-kidnaping-in-south-africa-takes-major-turn-as-ransom-demanded-101744543378053.html

https://www.al.com/news/2025/04/an-american-pastor-was-abducted-at-gunpoint-in-south-africa-while-preaching-a-sermon.html?outputType=amp

https://m.jpost.com/christianworld/article-849958

https://nypost.com/2025/04/12/world-news/american-pastor-kidnapped-from-church-by-masked-gunmen-while-preaching-sermon-in-south-africa/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y6xq4ex1ro.amp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14603243/amp/american-pastor-kidnapped-Josh-Sullivan-South-Africa-gunpoint.html

Thursday, April 10, 2025

How jealous is God?


 Pamagat: Gaano Ka-seloso ang Diyos?

Talata: Exodo 34:14 – "Sapagka't hindi ka dapat sumamba sa ibang dios: sapagka't ang Panginoon, na ang pangalan ay Mapanibughuin, ay isang mapanibughuing Dios."

I. Pag-unawa sa Paninibugho ng Diyos


A. Kahulugan ng Paninibugho


Selos ng tao: makasarili, mayabang, at puno ng inggit.

Paninibugho ng Diyos: banal, dalisay, at nagpapakita ng pagmamahal at pagtatanggol.


B. Paninibugho ng Diyos sa Kasulatan

Exodo 20:5 – “Ako ang Panginoon mong Dios, na mapanibughuin…”

Deuteronomio 4:24 – “Sapagka’t ang Panginoon mong Dios ay isang apoy na tumutupok, isang mapanibughuing Dios.”

Josue 24:19 – “Siya ay banal na Dios; siya ay isang mapanibughuing Dios…”


II. Ang Dahilan ng Paninibugho ng Diyos


A. Eksklusibong Ugnayan


Tulad ng tapat na asawang lalaki (Hosea 2:19-20).


Tinubos ng Diyos ang Kanyang bayan — sila ay pag-aari Niya.


B. Nasasaktan ang Diyos sa Pagsamba sa Diyus-diyosan

Ang pagsamba sa ibang dios ay katumbas ng espirituwal na pakikiapid.

Nagseselos ang Diyos kapag ang puso natin ay lumalayo sa Kanya at pumupunta sa mga “diyos” tulad ng pera, karangalan, at sariling kagustuhan.


III. Mga Bunga ng Hindi Paggalang sa Paninibugho ng Diyos

A. Disiplina at Hatol

Ang paninibugho ng Diyos ay may dalang hustisya (Deuteronomio 6:15).

Hindi ito dahil sa galit na walang dahilan, kundi dahil sa pag-ibig at pagwawasto.


B. Napuputol na Pakikipag-ugnayan

Ang pagsamba sa diyus-diyosan ay naglalayo sa atin sa presensya ng Diyos.

Hindi Siya makikibahagi ng Kanyang kaluwalhatian sa iba (Isaias 42:8).


IV. Ang Kagandahan ng Paninibugho ng Diyos

A. Ipinapakita Nito ang Kanyang Malalim na Pagmamahal

Hindi tayo pinababayaan ng Diyos — mahal Niya tayo ng lubos.

Ang Kanyang paninibugho ay proteksyon laban sa kapahamakan.


B. Nais ng Diyos ang Buo Nating Puso

Relasyon, hindi relihiyon lamang.

Ang buong pagsuko ay nagdudulot ng tunay na kapayapaan at kagalakan.

Konklusyon:

Ang paninibugho ng Diyos ay isang paanyaya sa lubos na katapatan. Karapat-dapat Siya sa buong pagsamba at debosyon natin. Ayaw Niyang nahahati ang ating puso.

Hamón:

Mayroon bang “diyus-diyosan” na umaagaw ng iyong puso mula

 sa Diyos?

Bumalik ka sa Diyos na mapanibughuin — ang Diyos na lubos na nagmamahal sa iyo.

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

PASTOR AND POLITICS, IS IT PROHIBITED TO ENGAGE?

PROHIBITED OR NOT, PROS & CONS

1. Biblical Perspective

The Bible does not explicitly prohibit pastors from engaging in politics, but it provides principles that guide their involvement:

Citizenship and Responsibility: Paul exercised his Roman citizenship (Acts 22:25-29) and spoke boldly before governors and kings (Acts 24–26), showing that believers can engage with civil authorities.

Salt and Light: Jesus said, “Ye are the salt of the earth... Ye are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:13-14). This implies influence, even in societal matters—including governance.

Priority of the Gospel: Paul told Timothy to focus on preaching the Word “in season and out of season” (2 Timothy 4:2). The main calling of a pastor is spiritual leadership, not political office.

Avoiding Entanglement: Paul warned that a good soldier of Christ does not get entangled in the affairs of this life (2 Timothy 2:4), which may caution against political distractions.


Summary: The Bible permits involvement but urges pastors to prioritize their spiritual mission.


2. Legal Perspective (in various countries)

This depends on the country and its laws regarding church and state:

In the United States, pastors can vote, speak about political issues, and personally support candidates. However, if their church is a tax-exempt nonprofit (501(c)(3)), they cannot officially endorse political candidates from the pulpit or use church resources for campaigning.

In the Philippines, where many Baptists reside, pastors are not legally prohibited from running for office. Some even serve as barangay captains, councilors, or representatives. However, involvement must not interfere with church duties.

In authoritarian countries, pastors may face risk or restrictions for political speech or participation.


Summary: Legally, pastors are often allowed to engage in politics, but they must follow the rules of their government and be aware of the consequences.


3. Practical and Ministry Considerations

While pastors can be involved in politics, they must consider:

Will this help or hinder the Gospel?

Will it divide the congregation?

Am I called more to preach Christ or pass laws?

Am I becoming more of a politician than a shepherd?


Some churches believe pastors should remain politically neutral to maintain their prophetic voice and minister to people of all political views.


Final Answer:

No, pastors are not strictly prohibited from engaging in politics, biblically or legally (depending on the country). However:

Their priority must be the ministry of the Word and prayer.

They should not let political involvement compromise their calling or cause division.

They must act in wisdom, with accountability and prayerful discernment.

Here’s a helpful Pros and Cons List, along with Guidelines for pastors considering political involvement:


Pastors & Politics: Pros and Cons

Pros:

1. Influence for Righteousness

A godly pastor can advocate for biblical values in laws and policies (Proverbs 14:34).


2. Protection of Religious Freedom

Political involvement can help defend the church's freedom to preach and operate.


3. Voice for the Voiceless

Pastors can speak up for the poor, oppressed, and unborn, bringing justice and mercy into public life (Micah 6:8).


4. Example of Engagement

Shows believers how to be responsible citizens who care about the welfare of their nation (Jeremiah 29:7).


Cons:

1. Risk of Dividing the Church

Political affiliations may alienate members or distract from the unity of the gospel (1 Corinthians 1:10-13).


2. Mission Drift

Time and energy spent on political matters can shift focus away from spiritual ministry (Acts 6:2).


3. Public Scrutiny & Attacks

Entering politics invites criticism that could damage a pastor’s spiritual testimony.


4. Temptation of Power

Political roles come with influence, and without humility, pride or compromise may follow (1 Timothy 3:6-7).


Guidelines for Pastors Considering Politics

1. Pray Deeply and Seek Counsel

Involve spiritual mentors, church elders, and trusted believers before making political decisions (Proverbs 11:14).


2. Evaluate Your Calling

Ask: Has God called me to be a shepherd or a statesman? (Ephesians 4:11-12)


3. Maintain Gospel Centrality

Never let political opinions overshadow Christ crucified. Be known first as a preacher of truth, not a partisan leader (1 Corinthians 2:2).


4. Avoid Church Resources for Campaigning

Keep the pulpit sacred and don’t use church finances, platforms, or worship gatherings for political promotion.


5. Pursue Justice and Righteousness, Not Party Lines

Promote biblical truth, not just political ideologies (Isaiah 1:17).


6. Prepare for Criticism and Accountability

Be ready to explain your actions biblically and humbly answer to your church and community.

A QUESTION WAS ASKED

# Questions to Explore Predestination and Free Will
1. How do you reconcile the idea of a sovereign God (Psalm 139:16, Proverbs 16:9) with human free will (Joshua 24:15, Romans 2:6-8)? Do you think one takes precedence over the other, or is there a balance between the two?

Reconciling God’s Sovereignty and Human Free Will

The Bible presents both the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man as parallel truths. God created man as a free moral agent, He tested it, but with Satan's deceitful and subtle attacks, they failed and suffered the consequences. Jesus, solved the problem by His promised payment for man's sin. Man as a person will always have the totality of the will, emotions, and knowledge like God, in His image.

God’s Sovereignty is evident in verses like Psalm 139:16, which shows God’s foreknowledge of our days, and Proverbs 16:9, which says, “A man's heart deviseth his way: but the Lord directeth his steps.”

Human Free Will is also clearly emphasized. Joshua 24:15 calls people to choose whom they will serve, and Romans 2:6-8 affirms that God will render to every man according to his deeds.


Rather than one truth canceling the other, they seem to work in harmony. God, in His omniscience, knows all choices we will make, but this foreknowledge does not negate our ability to choose. Theologians often describe this as compatibilism—the idea that divine sovereignty and human responsibility are compatible and coexisting truths.

So, is there a balance? Yes, but it's a divine mystery—God is fully in control, yet He allows real human decisions with real consequences. A helpful analogy is a master author writing a story where characters have meaningful choices, yet the author knows the end from the beginning.

Has God from eternity past foreordained all things that come to pass? 

 If the Lord directs the steps of a man, is this not proof that he is being controlled or governed by God? ‘A man’s heart deviseth his way: but the Lord directeth his steps.’(Proverbs 16:9,1,33). ‘The King’s heart is in the hand of the Lord, as the rivers of water: 
he turneth it whithersoever he will.’ (Proverbs 21:1). Calvinists think that God has foreordained every thought, word, deed and motive of all people in history. 

Note: When Calvinists see the words ‘preparations’, ‘answers’ (Proverbs 16:1), ‘steps’ (Prov. 16:4), ‘goings’ (Prov. 20:24), ‘judgments’ (Prov. 29:26), they see this as proof that God has foreordained all things. ‘The preparations of the heart in man, and the answer of the tongue, is from the Lord.’ Prov. 16:1. 

 Does God foreordain the following answers, steps, goings and judgments? 
a)What if a man prepared (Prov.16:1) to commit murder & rape? Did God foreordain this? Of course not. 
b)What if a man’s answer (Proverbs 16:1) was blasphemous and filthy? 
c)Was the answer of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:25) from the Lord? 
d)What about the steps (Proverbs 16:9) of a man as he steals or viciously beats innocent victims? 
e)What about a man’s goings (Proverbs 20:24) into a pub or brothel? 
f)What if a man judged (Proverbs 29:26) that sodomy and incest were OK? Did God ordain these? No! 

That God does not foreordain these events contradicts and disproves the Calvinists’ claim of God’s all-encompassing, eternal, sovereign decree. Paul asks: ‘Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.’ (Romans 9:14).


2. If God has already determined the course of events (Isaiah 46:10, Ephesians 1:11), what's the purpose of human effort and decision-making (Proverbs 16:3, Philippians 2:12-13)? Is it still meaningful to make choices and take actions?

If God Has Already Determined Events, Is Human Effort Still Meaningful?

Isaiah 46:10 declares that God knows “the end from the beginning,” and Ephesians 1:11 says He “worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” These affirm that God has a divine plan and nothing catches Him by surprise. Yet, this doesn’t make human choices meaningless.

Proverbs 16:3 encourages us to “commit thy works unto the Lord, and thy thoughts shall be established.” Philippians 2:12-13 also reveals a dual truth: “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,” because “it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.”

This shows a divine partnership. God is sovereign, but He invites us into active participation in His will. Human effort matters—not because it overrides God’s will—but because God uses our choices as part of His plan. Our obedience, faith, and decisions are the means through which God's purposes unfold in the world.

In short, human effort is not meaningless but divinely significant. Our decisions matter because they reflect our relationship with God, shape our character, and impact others. While God ordains the ultimate outcome, He honors the process of our willing cooperation.

How do we explain Proverbs 16:4, another pillar of Calvinist reprobation? 
“The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.” 

This verse discusses the use God makes of his creation, not the decisions he makes for them. 
Calvinists think that God made certain men wicked to fulfil the “counsel of his own will.” (Eph.1:11). 
Since God does all his pleasure (Isaiah 46:10), and has no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezekiel 33:11), then he could not have created a man wicked to show his power by damning him. 

If God sovereignly make man to think and do things, Why make a man obedient to do evil, and make him suffer because he obeyed?

Note: God has made all men the same in the sense of, “He fashioneth their hearts alike” Psalm 33:13-15. 
Key:Although God does not make a man wicked, he makes the wicked serve his own glory & purposes. 
“Surely the wrath of man shall praise thee…” (Psalm 76:10).

What does the Bible say we are predestined to? Answer: a) Son-placing in heaven: ‘Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children (Greek: 
huiothesia = son placing) by Jesus Christ unto himself, according to the good pleasure of his will.’ (Ephesians 1:5). 
b) Praise his glory: ‘In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.’ (Ephesians 1:11,12). 
c) Conformed to the image of his Son in heaven: ‘For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called, and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.’ (Romans 8:29,30). 
Notice how these verses refute the Calvinist position: 
a) Predestination is never called a decree of God; 
b) Predestination is never said to take place before the foundation of the world; 
c) No-one is said to be predestined to salvation; 
d) No-one is said to be predestined to hell, condemnation, judgment or everlasting death; 
e) None of these verses mention predestination of angels. 

Conclusion: Hence, what the Bible says about predestination is irreconcilable with what Calvinists say about it. Predestination only concerns our destiny as Christians.

3. How do you understand passages that suggest a universal desire for salvation (1 Timothy 2:3-4, 2 Peter 3:9) alongside others that speak of a chosen or elect group (Romans 8:29-30, Ephesians 1:4-5)? Do you think this desire is conditional or unconditional?

How Can God Desire All to Be Saved, Yet Choose an Elect?

1 Timothy 2:3-4 says God “will have all men to be saved”, and 2 Peter 3:9 affirms He is “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.” These clearly show God’s heart for all people—His desire is universal, extending to every individual.

On the other hand, Romans 8:29-30 and Ephesians 1:4-5 speak of those whom God foreknew, predestinated, called, justified, and glorified—His “elect” whom He chose “before the foundation of the world.”

So how do we reconcile this?

One way to understand it is by recognizing the difference between God’s will of desire (or compassion) and God’s will of purpose (or decree):

God's desire is that all be saved—this reflects His love, mercy, and the value He places on human freedom.

God's purpose includes the choosing of certain individuals to fulfill His plan—this reflects His sovereignty and foreknowledge.

God elect ISRAEL. 
Isa 45:4: "4 For Jacob my servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me."

Israel was decreed to be where Jesus Christ lineage will pass, and be born as decreed, that is God's will of purpose, but it does not mean Israelites cannot not choose whom to serve, believe, and be saved.

Israel has lost sheep, rejected the Messiah, and Jesus, prioritize them with the limited commission before He launched the Great Commission.

Mat 10:6: "6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Mat 15:24: "24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Mat 23:37: "37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"

ELECTION IS NOT SALVATION, IT IS A PURPOSE OF GOD FOR ISRAEL AS THE LINEAGE OF THE SAVIOR.

Is the desire for salvation conditional or unconditional?
It depends on how you define “desire”:

If we're talking about God's love and invitation, it's unconditional—offered freely to all through the gospel.

But receiving salvation is conditional—based on repentance and faith in Christ (John 3:16-18). Those who believe are saved; those who reject remain condemned.

Ultimately, both truths exist in harmony:

God genuinely desires all to be saved (universal call).

God sovereignly works through an elect people (specific fulfillment).

Rather than a contradiction, it’s a beautiful mystery of divine mercy and justice woven together.

Election Not to salvation, but to Godly living. 

God chooses and elects every Christian to holiness and Godliness in this life. God predestines that every Christian will be conformed to the image of Christ in heaven. 
Romans 8:29. 

 “he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, THAT we should be holy and without blame before him in love.” Ephesians 1:4. 

 “Having predestinated us…to the praise of the glory of his grace…” Ephesians 1:5,6. 

 “The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, THAT thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth.” Acts 22:14. 

God chose Paul to know God’s will for his life. God chooses that we should know His will for our lives. 

 “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people: 
THAT ye should show forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.” 1 Peter 2:9.

 Here God chooses us to praise him by our life. 

 “I have chosen you out of the world.” John 15:19. 

Here Christ chooses us to come out of the worldly way of living of unbelievers. The Greek word for church is “ekklesia” meaning “called out of the world to live for God.” 

 “But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to to confound the things which are mighty; and God hath chosen the base things of the world, yea and the things which are not to bring to nought the things that are: THAT no flesh should glory in his presence.” 1 Corinthians 1:27-29. 

Here God chooses foolish, weak and base things of this world to bring to nought the things that are, so that no flesh should glory in God’s presence. 

“For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son…” Romans 8:29. Here God foreknew who would receive Christ as Saviour, and those people he predestinated to be conformed to the image of Christ in heaven. 

Of Israel, not to salvation, but to Serve God, bring Christ into the world, preserve the Scriptures, and proclaim to the world the truth of One Almighty Creator God. 

- “As concerning the gospel, they (Israel) are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the Father’s sakes.” Romans 11:28. 
- “at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.” Romans 11:5,7. 
Those of Israel who became Christians, did so because of faith and God’s foreknowledge. 
(1 Peter 1:2).

4. Can you explain how God's will or plan interacts with human decision-making (Proverbs 19:21, Philippians 2:13)? Is it a collaborative process, or does one take precedence over the other?

How Does God’s Will Interact with Human Decision-Making?

Proverbs 19:21 says, “There are many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the Lord, that shall stand.” This reminds us that while humans make plans, ultimately, God's purpose prevails.

Philippians 2:13 adds another layer: “For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” Here, we see God working within human will and actions to fulfill His desires.

So, how does this interaction work?
It’s best described as a collaborative process—not in the sense that God needs our help, but that He chooses to work through our decisions, shaping us as participants in His plan. We make real choices, and God uses those choices (whether wise or foolish) to accomplish His greater purposes (Genesis 50:20 is a good example).

However, while it's collaborative in expression, God’s will takes ultimate precedence. He remains sovereign and is never surprised or frustrated by human actions. Yet, He invites us into partnership, where our choices have real significance and consequences.

This tension invites us to live responsibly, knowing that:

God is sovereign and His plan will succeed.

Our choices matter and are used by God to fulfill His will. Christians are disciplined and rewarded by how we respond.

5. How do you respond to the critique that a deterministic view of the universe can make God seem arbitrary or unloving (Romans 9:14-15, 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14)? Are there ways to reconcile this tension?

Why does God give the new birth to people? 
 
God gives the new birth to ‘as many as received him.’ John 1:12 . 

Romans 9:16 ‘So then, it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.’ Calvinists claim that man does not have the will to receive Christ and salvation.

Man does have the ability to receive Christ, while in a state of depravity. 
- If ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine.’ (Romans 6:17). 
- ‘Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.’ (John 5:40). 
 - ‘Whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.’ (Revelation 22:7). 
Key: The reason men don’t receive Christ is because they will not, not because they are unable.

Romans 9:13 ‘Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.’ Calvinists think Jacob was personally elected to salvation, and Esau was personally elected to eternal desolation (hell). 
a) The purpose of God according to election (Romans 9:11) concerns service: ‘The elder shall serve the younger.’ (Romans 9:12). This teaches national preference, not election to salvation
b) Genesis 25:23 ‘Two nations are in thy womb … the elder shall serve the younger.’ c) Romans 9:13 is quoted from Malachi 1:1-3, written 1400 years later: ‘Yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste.’ In Genesis we have a prophetic statement looking forward. 
In Malachi we have a historical statement looking backward. 
d) Calvin admits that this refers to Jacob’s and Esau’s posterity (Institutes, p 930, III, xxi,7). 
e) God didn’t hate Esau personally in eternity past. God hated him nationally after seeing his sins for 1400 years. 
e) Jesus loved the rich young ruler who rejected him. (Mark 10:22).

Romans 9:18 ‘Pharaoh … whom he will he hardeneth.’ 
Q: Were Pharaoh and Esau sovereignly hated from eternity? NO, because: 

Answer: 
a) God raised up Pharaoh from sickness of boils (Exodus 9:11-16) not into existence. 
b) Q: When does God harden a persons heart? From eternity or after he hardens his own heart? Pharaoh hardened himself first. (Exodus 8:15,32; 9:34) ‘Pharaoh hardened his heart.’ God reinforced Pharaoh’s decision by hardening him later

The Critique: "God seems arbitrary or unloving"

In Romans 9:14-15 (KJV), Paul writes:

> “What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.”

 The Balancing Text: 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 (KJV)

> “But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he called you by our gospel…”

Here we see:

Divine choice ("from the beginning chosen you")

Human response ("belief of the truth")

Means of calling ("by our gospel")

This shows that God's choice includes human responsibility and the instrumentality of the gospel.

2 Thessalonians 2:13 ‘God hath from the beginning (Gk: ap arche) chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth.’ a) ‘from the beginning’ (ap arche as in Acts 26:4) is different from ‘from eternity’ (ap aionos as in Acts 15:18) as God did not choose the Thessalonians from eternity past, but from the beginning of when Paul left Philippi. ‘Now ye Philippians know also, that in the beginning of the Gospel, when I departed from Macedonia …’ (Philippians 4:15,16). Paul defines ‘the beginning of the gospel’ as when he left Philippi to begin his departure from the province of Macedonia. God chose that the Thessalonians would hear the gospel from the beginning of Paul’s departure from Philippi (2 Thessalonians 2:13), when Christ gave Paul the Macedonian call in Acts 16:10 and 17:1-4 in 53 AD, and not by a sovereign decree in eternity past. 
 b) The conditions of God saving the Thessalonians are ‘sanctification of the Spirit (God’s part) and belief/obedience of the truth of Christ (man’s part).’

1 Peter 1:2 is a similar passage: ‘Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ.’ 
Calvinists err saying that ‘from the beginning’ means ‘from before the beginning of the world’ 
In Calvinism the ‘elect’ are all put in Christ in eternity past, but in the Bible no-one is put in Christ until he is saved.
 ‘Salute Andronicus & Junia…who also were in Christ before me.’ Rom 16:7

3. Reconciliation: Sovereignty and Love are Not Opposed

To reconcile this:

a. God’s Choices Are Never Arbitrary

Romans 9 emphasizes God's mercy is His to give—not based on human merit but according to His purpose and character (Romans 9:11).

His will is rooted in His nature: perfectly just, perfectly loving, and perfectly wise. What appears arbitrary to us may simply reflect our limited view of His eternal wisdom.

b. Mercy Is Undeserved, Not Owed

Paul's argument in Romans 9 assumes that no one deserves mercy. The shock isn't that God doesn't save everyone—it’s that He saves anyone. If justice were the only measure, all would be condemned (Romans 3:10-12, 23).

c. God’s Love Is Evident in the Gospel Call

2 Thessalonians 2:14 shows that the call of the gospel is how God draws people to Himself. It's not mechanical determinism; it’s relational—rooted in love and truth. His choice includes a process involving sanctification and belief.

Ephesians 1:4. Calvinists use Ephesians 1:4 and II Thessalonians 2:13 to teach Unconditional Election to salvation in eternity past. ‘According as he hath chosen us in HIM before the foundation of the world, THAT we should be holy and without blame before him in love.’ (Ephesians 1:4). 
We are chosen not to be saved, but THE SAVED IS to be holy and without blame
b) Key: God chose that whoever was in Christ would be ‘blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places’ (v.3) and be ‘holy and without blame before him in love.’

4. Biblical and Pastoral Reflections

Mystery and Majesty: Romans 9 ends not with complete resolution but awe: “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!” (Romans 11:33). Sometimes tension points to God's majesty, not contradiction.

Evangelism Still Matters: God ordains both the ends and the means. He chooses to use preaching, witnessing, and prayer to bring people to Himself.

Comfort for Believers: Election isn’t meant to cause fear, but assurance. If God chose you in Christ, it’s because of His love and mercy, not your works (Ephesians 1:4-6).

John 3:18: "18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."



HISTORY OF CALVINISM 

Historical Background History reveals that "Calvinism" is not new. An early 5 th century British monk by the name of Pelagius, who denied the doctrine of "original sin", had taught that man possessed absolute "free will" whereby he could either choose or reject God. His historic opponent was the theologian, Augustine, who insisted that the scriptures taught that man was dead in trespasses and sins and in bondage to Satan. Man's will, said Augustine, was not in the least "free", and only when God gave His grace to man could man then choose to serve God. Augustine taught that man lost the ability to choose when Adam sinned and was cast out of the garden. Augustine's doctrines were accepted, but Pelagius was branded a heretic and excommunicated by the Catholic Church. 
As time went by, the Catholic Church moved toward the doctrine of the "Sacraments" and central power of the church causing some to raise protests. During the late 15 th century, the issue was sharpened. Erasmus, the humanist and theologian of the Church of Rome, issued a "Diatribe" in which he protested sovereign grace and argued for man's free will to "make a decision" for Christ. This was countered by the volatile pen of the protestant reformer, Martin Luther, in his thesis on "The Bondage of the Human Will." Thus began the Protestant Reformation led by such men as Luther, Zwingli and Calvin. 
These men were Catholics by training, but their independent Bible study led them to question or protest the practices of the Catholic Church and seek to reform it. About 1530 Calvin broke away from the Catholic Church, and in 1536 published his book, "Institutes of the Christian Religion". Throughout his life he developed and refined these thoughts, but this work served as a basis for what later came to be known as "Calvinism". In the latter part of 16 th century Calvin's doctrines were accepted as the official religion of Holland and published in the form of the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism. This doctrine was organized into the five points of Calvinism and endorsed by the Great Synod of Dort in 1619. 
The five points or doctrinal positions of Calvinism were formulated by the Great Synod of Dort in reply to a document called "Remonstrance". This "protest" was presented to the State of Holland by the disciples of a Dutch seminary professor (Jacob Hermann) whose Latin surname was Arminius. Arminius (1560-1609) was only 4 years old when John Calvin (1509-1564) died. Although reared in the Reformed tradition, Arminius had serious doubts as to the sovereign grace of God, for his natural reason was sympathetic to the teachings of Pelagius and Erasmus concerning the free will of man. Within a year of the death of Arminius, his disciples formulated his teachings into five main points, which they proceeded to present to the State with the desire that the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism be replaced by the teachings of their professor. 
The Great Synod of Dort was convened by the States-General in 1618 for the specific purpose of examining the Five Points of Arminianism in the light of the Holy Scripture. Eighty-four theologians and 18 secular commissioners were assembled for 154 sessions lasting from November 13, 1618 until May 9, 1619. After thorough examination of the doctrines of Arminius, carefully comparing his teachings with those of Holy Writ, the Synod determined that his views were heretical. The members of the Great Synod did not stop there, however, but carefully formulated a 5-point rebuttal from the scriptures that later became known as "The Five Points of Calvinism." 

Sunday, April 6, 2025

What kind of Pastor are you?



"What Kind of Pastor Are You?"

Key Text: Matthew 23:11 – “But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.”


1. Pastor Politician

Motive: Pleasing people over pleasing God.
Scripture: Galatians 1:10 – “For do I now persuade men, or God? ... for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.”
Warning: Political pastors are compromisers. They shift with the crowd, not anchored in truth.
Application: Stand firm in doctrine even when it's unpopular.


2. Pastor Salesman

Motive: Promoting programs, products, or personalities more than the Person of Christ.
Scripture: 2 Corinthians 2:17 – “For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity…”
Warning: The Gospel is not for sale. Ministry is not marketing.
Application: Preach Christ, not a brand. Focus on truth, not trends.


3. Pastor Comedian

Motive: Seeking laughs, popularity, or lighthearted moments over deep conviction.
Scripture: Ephesians 5:4 – “Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient…”
Warning: While humor has its place, the pulpit is not a stage for entertainment.
Application: Let the message be sobering and Spirit-filled.


4. Pastor Entertainer

Motive: Performance-based ministry.
Scripture: 2 Timothy 4:3-4 – “...they will not endure sound doctrine... they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.”
Warning: Entertainment draws crowds but doesn’t build disciples.
Application: Focus on feeding sheep, not amusing goats.


5. Pastor Deceiver

Motive: Selfish agenda or false doctrine for control or gain.
Scripture: Jeremiah 23:16 – “Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain…”
Warning: Deceivers mislead many and face God’s judgment.
Application: Handle God’s Word honestly and fearfully.


6. Pastor Money Maker

Motive: Love of money over love for souls.
Scripture: 1 Timothy 6:10 – “For the love of money is the root of all evil…”
Warning: Greedy pastors exploit the flock for riches.
Application: Be content. Trust God to provide. Serve, not swindle.


7. Pastor Servant (The True Pastor)

Motive: Pleasing Christ, loving the flock, and feeding God’s people.
Scripture: John 13:14-15 – “If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another’s feet.”
Mark 10:45 – “For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister…”
Example: Jesus—the Good Shepherd, the humble Servant.
Application: Die to self daily. Serve the least. Preach the Word. Shepherd with love.


Conclusion:

Let every pastor, teacher, and servant of God ask:
Am I a servant? Or have I become something else?

Challenge: Return to the feet of Jesus. Lay down pride, ambition, and fleshly motives. Choose to be the servant pastor.



Saturday, April 5, 2025

The Fruit That Changed Everything


Title: The Fruit That Changed Everything

Key Verse:
Genesis 3:6 (KJV)“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food... she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.”

Main Thought:
The simple act of eating a forbidden fruit became the turning point in human history. It was not about the fruit, but the disobedience behind it. Through this act, sin entered the world, affecting every generation.


Discussion Questions:

  1. What command did God give Adam and Eve regarding the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? (Genesis 2:16–17)
  2. How did Satan tempt Eve to doubt God’s word? (Genesis 3:1–5)
  3. What were the immediate consequences of Adam and Eve’s disobedience? (Genesis 3:7–10)
  4. How did this act affect all of humanity? (Romans 5:12)
  5. What hope do we have through Jesus Christ? (Romans 5:19, 1 Corinthians 15:22)

Compromise in Doctrine

Key Verse:
Mark 7:7 (KJV)“Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”

Reflection:
Just as Eve compromised God's command by listening to the serpent, today many compromise God’s truth by replacing it with man-made traditions. Jesus warned that such worship is in vain. When we add or subtract from God's Word, we repeat the same error that led to the fall.

Questions:

  1. What does Mark 7:7 say about mixing man’s commandments with God’s doctrine?
  2. How can compromise in doctrine affect generations, just as sin did in Eden?
  3. What steps can believers take to guard against false teachings? (2 Timothy 2:15)

Application:
God desires obedience, not compromise. True worship flows from truth. We must stand firm in biblical doctrine and reject teachings that replace God’s Word with human ideas.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

BAPTIST HISTORY

 


WHY BAPTISTS ARE NOT PROTESTANTS

by Dr. Vernon C. Lyons

People are usually put in one of three religious groups. If you are not a Jew or a Roman Catholic, then automatically you are a Protestant. Consequently, Baptists are usually called "Protestants." However, this does not match the facts. Baptists never have been Protestants.

The Protestant Reformation is usually dated from October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenburg, Germany. However, this was only one of a series of acts that led to the open rupture with Rome.

An event of utmost importance, but often unnoticed, is the Second Diet (or Council) of Speier, April 25, 1529. This was a Roman Catholic Council for the purpose of taking action against the Turks and checking the progress of Lutherans and others who were not cooperating with the Pope. Certain Lutheran princes appeared before this Roman Catholic Diet with a formal written protest against those matters in which the Diet went contrary to the Christian faith as they understood it. This protest was signed by Elector John of Saxony, Margrave George of Brandenburg, Dukes Ernest and Francis of Braunschweig-Luneburg, Landgrave Philip of Hesse, Prince Wolfgang of Anhalt and the representatives of fourteen imperial cities. The protest was designed to protect them from the decisions of this Council. It was a defensive measure. The celebrated church historian, Philip Schaaf, makes the noteworthy statement "From this protest. and appeal, the Lutherans were called Protestants." (History of the Christian Church, Volume VII, p.692). The same facts are stated in the Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume Xll, p.495).

These Lutheran leaders, and a few Reformed, who made this appeal and protest at the famous Diet of Speier were speaking for themselves and not for Baptists, of whom they themselves said in their written statement, "All Anabaptists and rebaptized persons, male or female, of mature age, shall be judged and brought from natural life to death, by fire, or sword or otherwise, as may benefit the persons, without preceding trial by spiritual judges." The Baptists then did not share in this protest and consequently cannot bear the name "Protestant." Here are three reasons why Baptists are not Protestants.


Historically Baptists Are Not Protestants

Protestants date from the sixteenth century. They are the Lutherans, the Reformed, and others who were once Roman Catholics and left the Roman Catholic faith to start denominations of their own. The Baptists never left the Roman Catholic church as did Luther, Calvin and Zwingli. They never left because they were never in. They did not begin their existence at the time of the Reformation, but hundreds of years prior to the Reformation.

Baptists make no effort to trace a historical succession back to the age of the Apesties. Their only claim is that at every age in church history there have been groups that have held to the same doctrines that Baptists hold today. These groups may or may not have been connected and they have been known by various names. There were the Montanists (150 A.D.), the Novatians (240 A.D.), Donatists (305 A.D.), Albigenses (1022 A.D.), Waldensians (1170 A.D.), and the name Anabaptists came into prominence just before the time of the Protestant Reformation. Full historical data immediately refutes the view that there was only one religious group -- the Roman Catholic church -until the time of Martin Luther. Anyone who claims this simply has not done his homework.

l wish to purposely introduce non-Baptist testimony to the great antiquity of Baptist people. Cardinal Hosius (1504-1579) was a Roman Catholic prelate who had as his life work the investigation and suppression of non-Catholic groups. By Pope Paul IV he was designated one of the three papal presidents of the famous Council of Trent. Hosius carried on vigorously the work of the counter-reformation. If anyone in post-reformation times knew the doctrines and history of nonCatholic groups, it was Hosius. Cardinal Hosius says, "Were it not that the Baptists have been grievously tormented and cut off with the knife during the past 1,200 years, they would swarm in greater number than all the Reformers" (Letters Apud Opera, pp.112, 113). Note carefully that this knowledgeable Catholic scholar has spoken of the vicious persecution Baptists have endured, that he clearly distinguishes them from the Reformers, and that he dates them 1,200 years before the Protestant Reformation.

It is also evident that the Baptists were not Protestants because they were fiercely persecuted by the Protestant Reformers and their followers. Uncounted thousands of them lost their goods, their lands, and their lives in these persecutions. Konred Grebel died in prison in 1526. Felix Manz was drowned by the authorities at Zurich in 1527. Noted Baptist leader Baithauser Hubmaier was burned alive at the stake in Vienna March 10, 1528. Three days later his wife was drowned by being thrown over the Danube bridge with a stone tied to her neck. The facts abundantly attest that historically Baptists are not Protestants.


Doctrinally Baptists Are Not Protestants

The viewpoint that Baptists share common doctrinal ground with Protestant groups is not an accurate reporting of the facts. There are six striking differences.

Baptists believe with all their hearts that God's Word alone is sufficient for faith and practice. We read "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine..." (II Timothy 3:16). Various Protestant denominations have creeds, catechisms and assorted doctrinal standards. Baptists hold to the Bible alone.


Baptists believe that Christ and only Christ is the Head of the Church even as the Scripture says, "Christ is the head of the church" (Ephesians 5:23). There is no man who has the oversight of Baptist churches. Baptists have no denomination in the sense of an organization that controls local congregations. Each local church is autonomous and accountable only to Christ, who is its Head. A Baptist church, while fellowshipping with congregations of like faith and practice, has no earthly headquarters. Its headquarters is in Heaven.


Baptists believe from their hearts in a free church in a free state. Christ plainly taught that the state and the church each had its own realm when he said, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things which are God's" (Matthew 22:21 ). Baptists are vigorously opposed to union of state and church and believe that a state controlled church is a wretched excuse for Christianity and a plain departure from Scripture. All of the Protestant Reformers fastened state churches upon their followers.


Baptists believe strongly in individual accountability to God because the Scriptures clearly teach that "every one of us shall give account of himself to God" (Romans 14:12). A priest cannot answer for you, a church cannot answer for you to God. God-parents cannot answer for you. No one is saved because of what his parents believe. No one is ,saved because of his identification with any religion. He will account for himself to God. Protestants .generally do not hold this scriptural doctrine.


Baptist people furthermore have always held to believers' baptism. None of the Protestant Reformers held this Bible teaching. In the Scriptures, faith and repentance always preceded baptism. On the day of Pentecost Peter plainly told the people, "Repent and be baptized" (Acts 2:38). This obviously means that there is no infant baptism since infants are incapable of repenting. No unbelievers are to be baptized. The Reformers followed Rome in their teaching on baptism. Baptists have held steadfastly to the doctrine of Christ and His Apostles on this point.


Baptist people furthermore have always held to believers' baptism. None of the Protestant Reformers held this Bible teaching. In the Scriptures, faith and repentance always preceded baptism. On the day of Pentecost Peter plainly told the people, "Repent and be baptized" (Acts 2:38). This obviously means that there is no infant baptism since infants are incapable of repenting. No unbelievers are to be baptized. The Reformers followed Rome in their teaching on baptism. Baptists have held steadfastly to the doctrine of Christ and His Apostles on this point.


Baptists, on the basis of Scripture, have always held to a regenerate church membership; that is, a membership that is made up only of people who give a credible profession of faith in Christ. In the apostolic church, only those who became believers, those who received the Word of God and who had repented of their sins, were baptized and received as church members (Acts 2:41). There was no automatic or formalistic membership in apostolic churches nor in Baptist churches today.

From the review of these simple points it is more than clear that doctrinally Baptists are not Protestants.


Practically Baptists Are Not Protestants

A few simple observations indicate that the Baptists differ radically from Protestants on a number of points.

The Protestant groups look to some human being as their founder, often even taking their name from a man. The Lutherans hark back to Luther. The Reformed look to John Calvin. The Presbyterians were rounded by John Knox. The Methodists openly acknowledge John Wesley as their founder. Who rounded the Baptist churches? Here is a historical question worthy of serious investigation. It is impossible to find any one man who gave rise to Baptist churches. Rather, if we would name human founders, we must look back to Peter, Paul, James and John.

We differ from Protestants in our birthplace. Lutherans came from Germany, the Reformed from Switzerland and the Netherlands, the Presbyterians from Scotland, Episcopalians from England, but Baptists would have to give Palestine as their place of origin.

Furthermore, the creed of Baptists is not the Augsburg Confession, the Canons of Dort, or the Westminster Confession, but the simple Word of God. So it is impossible to identify Baptists as Protestants.

Baptists have never been linked with Protestants and have never been identified with the Roman Catholic Church. Through the years before and after the Reformation, they have maintained their identity and been faithful to the Scriptures. Real Baptists hold to the plain teaching of Christ and the Apostles. For these God-given doctrines they have been willing to die. Hanz Denk, a sixteenth century Baptist, said, "Faith means obedience to the Word of God, whether it be unto life or unto death." For many it was death.

In Rottenburg in Reformation times there were 900 executions of Baptists in less than ten years. These deaths were often vicious and cruel. The sentence for one Baptist believer, Michael Sateler, read:

"Michael Sateler shall be delivered to the hangman, who shall take him to the place of execution and cut out his tongue; he shall then throw him on a cart and twice tare his flesh with hot tongs; then he shall bring him to the city gate and there torture his flesh in the same manner."

This was the way Sateler died in Rottenburg on May 21, 1527. His wife and other women were drowned and a number of the men were beheaded.

Baptists are not Protestants but hold tenaciously to the original precepts and practices of Christ and the apostles. Baptists believe the pure Word of God to be sufficient authority on all matters. Baptists reject all human religious traditions and practices that have originated since the time of the apostles.

- JB

Missionary Baptist not protestant


Sir Isaac Newton:

The Baptists are the only known body of Christians that has not symbolized with the Church of Rome.—The First Church, J. T. Mann

Mosheim (Lutheran):

Before the rise of Luther and Calvin, there lay secreted in almost all the countries of Europe persons who adhered tenaciously to the principles of modern Dutch Baptists.—The Baptist Spirit, Isaac J. Van Ness, William D. Nowlin

Cardinal Hosius (Catholic, 1524), President of the Council of Trent: 

“Were it not that the Baptists have been grievously tormented and cut off with the knife during the past twelve hundred years, they would swarm in greater number than all the Reformers.”—Hosius, Letters, Apud Opera, p. 112, 113.

The “twelve hundred years” were the years preceding the Reformation in which Rome persecuted Baptists with the most cruel persecution thinkable.

Edinburg Cyclopedia (Presbyterian):

“It must have already occurred to our readers that the Baptists are the same sect of Christians that were formerly described as Ana-Baptists. Indeed this seems to have been their leading principle from the time of Tertullian to the present time.”—The Trail of Blood, J. M. Carroll

John Clark Ridpath (Methodist):

“I should not readily admit that there was a Baptist Church as far back as A. D. 100, though without doubt there were Baptists then, as all Christians were then Baptists.”—Cole C.D. Definitions of Doctrine, Volume III, The New Testament Church

Professor Wm. C. Duncan, of the Department of Greek and Latin, University of Louisiana:

“Baptists do not, as most Protestant denominations, date their origin from the Reformation of 1520. By means of that great movement they were brought out of comparative obscurity into prominent notice. They did not, however, originate with the Reformation; for long before Luther lived; yea, long before the Catholic Church itself was known, Baptist and Baptist churches flourished in Europe, Asia and Africa.”—Moser, M. L. Jr. Baptist Handbook for Church Members (Revised), Little Rock, Arkansas: Challenge Press, 1983, p. 46.

Zwingli, the the Swiss reformer, contemporary with Luther and Calvin (1525):

“The institution of Anabaptism is no novelty but for thirteen hundred years has caused great disturbances in the church and has acquired such a strength that the attempt in this age to contend with it appeared futile for a while.”—Dayton, Amos Cooper. Pedobaptist and Campbellite Immersions. Southwestern Publishing House, 1858, p. 150. (By the “church” Zwingli means the Roman Catholic church.)

Robert Barclay (Quaker):

“We shall afterwards show the rise of the Anabaptists took place prior to the Reformation of the Church of England, and there are also reasons for believing that on the Continent of Europe small hidden Christian societies, who have held many of the opinions of the Anabaptists, have existed from the times of the apostles.”—Christian, John T. History of the Baptists together with Some Account of Their Principles and Practices. Nashville, TN: Baptist Sunday School Committee of the American Baptist Association, 1922

William C. King

“Of the Baptists it may be said that they are not Reformers. These people, comprising bodies of Christian believers, known under various names in different countries, are entirely independent of and distinct from the Greek and Roman churches, and have an unbroken continuity from apostolic days down through the centuries. Throughout this long period they were bitterly persecuted for heresy, driven from country to country, disfranchised, deprived of their property, imprisoned, tortured and slain by the thousands; yet they swerved not from the New Testament faith, doctrine and practice.”—King, William C. Crossing the Centuries. Springfield, MA: Editorial Associates, 1912

The duty of a Pastor

 👨‍🏫The True Work and Responsibility of a Pastor Theme: Pastoring is preaching God’s Word, rebuking, and teaching, because God will judge ...