Baptism Immersion: Is it unscriptural that the Baptizer is not in the water?

IS IT NECESSARY THAT BOTH THE BAPTIZER AND THE CANDIDATE BE ON THE WATER?

Biblically speaking, it is not strictly necessary that the baptizer be fully in the water if the baptism by immersion can still be properly carried out. However, the New Testament pattern for baptism—especially in the case of John the Baptist and Philip with the Ethiopian eunuch—shows that both the baptizer and the candidate went into the water together:

> “And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water...” (Matthew 3:16, KJV)

“And they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.” (Acts 8:38, KJV)

Why Both Entered the Water:

1. Mode of Baptism: Baptism in the New Testament was by immersion, symbolizing the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ (Romans 6:3–4).

2. Practicality: Full immersion is difficult unless the baptizer is also in the water to guide and safely submerge the candidate in the river, or sea.

3. Pattern: The consistent pattern is both going into the water—this sets a biblical precedent.

Can It Be Done Without the Baptizer in the Water?

If immersion can still be achieved safely and reverently without the baptizer entering the water (e.g., from a riverbank, platform, or poolside), it may technically still fulfill the symbolic act.

Conclusion:

While not an absolute requirement, it is highly recommended—and most biblically faithful—to have the baptizer also in the water to follow the scriptural model, maintain reverence, and ensure the candidate is properly immersed. It also displays unity, humility, and personal involvement in this sacred ordinance.

HOW ABOUT IN A BAPTISTRY?

In a baptistry—a specially designed pool or tank used for baptisms in many churches—the principle remains the same: the baptizer should normally be in the water with the candidate.

Why the Baptizer Should Be in the Water (Even in a Baptistry):

1. Biblical Example Still Applies

Acts 8:38: “...and they went down both into the water...”

Even in a man-made setting, the biblical model of immersion is best preserved when both the baptizer and the candidate enter the water.

2. Immersion Requires Assistance

Full immersion (symbolizing burial and resurrection) usually requires the baptizer to guide and support the candidate for safety, especially when going backward and rising up from the water.

3. Reverence and Participation

Baptism is a personal and spiritual act. Having the baptizer inside the baptistry reflects care, humility, and a shepherd’s role in the believer’s public confession.

4. Tradition and Order in Baptist Practice

In Baptist churches and most evangelical circles, the baptizer being in the water is the standard and accepted practice. Not doing so may appear unorthodox or improper unless there’s a valid reason.

Exceptions or Alternatives:

In rare cases (e.g., physical limitations, health concerns, unique baptistry design), adjustments may be made.

Some churches have designed walk-in baptistries with dry areas for the baptizer, but even then, the candidate is still fully immersed.

Conclusion:

Even in a baptistry, it is most proper, biblical, and practical for the baptizer to be in the water with the candidate. It reflects scriptural obedience, ensures safety, and affirms the symbolism of baptism by immersion.

It is not explicitly unscriptural for the baptizer to be outside the water as long as the baptism by immersion is properly and fully carried out. 

1. What the Bible Shows (Biblical Pattern)

The New Testament gives a consistent pattern:

Jesus’ baptism:

“Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water...” (Matthew 3:16)

Implies He was in the water, and so was John.

Ethiopian eunuch’s baptism:

“They went down both into the water... and he baptized him.” (Acts 8:38)

Clearly shows both Philip (baptizer) and the eunuch (candidate) were in the water.

2. What Makes a Baptism Scriptural?

For a baptism to be scriptural, it must:

A. Be done after salvation (Acts 2:41)

B. Be done by immersion (Romans 6:3–4)

C. Be done in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (Matthew 28:19)

D. Be performed with the authority of a biblically sound church (Acts 2:47)

The baptizer’s position (in or out of the water) is not explicitly commanded, but the examples show him in the water.

3. Is It Unscriptural?

Technically: Not strictly unscriptural if immersion is truly carried out, and other biblical requirements are met.

4. Conclusion

No, it is not explicitly unscriptural.

But yes, it is strictly practiced that the candidate be fully submerged and safely raised as the symbol of death, burial and resurrection can be shown, as long that it can be done safely with the other requirements of authority, right candidate, and right mode, it is scriptural. There is no specific scriptural instructions that the baptizer be also submerged or must be in the water in doing so.

> “Let all things be done decently and in order.” (1 Corinthians 14:40)

The Problem of Seminaries with Inconsistent Teachers and Students

Title: The Problem of Seminaries with Inconsistent Teachers and Students

One of the critical issues facing many seminaries today is the inconsistency of both teachers and students in their doctrine, lifestyle, and commitment to biblical truth. Inconsistent teachers may preach one thing and live another, or lack alignment with the seminary’s core theological convictions. This creates confusion, breeds compromise, and damages the spiritual growth of students.

Inconsistent students, on the other hand, may lack spiritual discipline, fail to apply biblical truths, or jump from one doctrinal stance to another. This instability leads to a lack of maturity and fruitlessness in ministry. Furthermore, students who are not held accountable may carry their confusion into churches and ministries, causing greater doctrinal errors and divisions.

This problem reveals a deeper need for spiritual integrity, accountability, and doctrinal clarity in theological institutions. Seminaries must carefully vet and train their teachers, and require students to commit to consistent study, lifestyle, and doctrinal alignment rooted in the Word of God. Only then can seminaries fulfill their mission to train faithful servants of Christ.

The Problem of Seminaries with Inconsistent Teachers and Students

“Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” – Amos 3:3 (KJV)

In the spiritual formation and academic training of future church leaders, seminaries play a crucial role. However, one of the pressing issues affecting their effectiveness is the presence of inconsistent teachers and students. This problem undermines the purpose and integrity of theological education.

1. Inconsistent Teachers: A Source of Confusion

Teachers are expected to be models of doctrinal soundness, integrity, and spiritual maturity. When instructors differ in beliefs, teaching methods, or ministry philosophy, the seminary becomes a place of confusion rather than clarity. Some teachers may uphold biblical authority, while others tolerate liberal theology or questionable practices. This inconsistency can:

Mislead students and sow doctrinal doubt.

Dilute the seminary’s identity and mission.

Cause divisions among faculty and students.

Lead to graduates who are uncertain in their faith and ministry direction.

A seminary must ensure that its teachers are unified in doctrine and committed to a biblical worldview. Paul warned Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 of a time when people "will not endure sound doctrine," and sadly, even some seminary faculty fall into this category today.

2. Inconsistent Students: A Hindrance to Discipleship

Seminaries also suffer when students are inconsistent in commitment, character, and beliefs. Some enroll out of curiosity, pride, or academic ambition rather than a divine calling. Others hop between seminaries, driven by convenience or influence rather than conviction. This results in:

Lack of spiritual growth and discipline.

Conflict with seminary rules and expectations.

Shallow convictions and doctrinal instability.

Future ministers who compromise truth for acceptance.

Students must be reminded that theological education is not just academic—it is a calling to be conformed to Christ (Romans 8:29). A seminary should not be a haven for religious tourists, but a training ground for faithful servants of God.

3. Consequences for the Church and the World

When seminaries tolerate inconsistency, the ripple effect is devastating:

Churches receive unprepared and divided leaders.

Congregations suffer under shallow or conflicting teachings.

The reputation of theological institutions is tarnished.

The Great Commission is hindered by poor witnesses.

Jesus said, “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation” (Matthew 12:25). Seminaries that allow theological or moral inconsistency are headed toward spiritual ineffectiveness.

4. Solutions: Upholding Biblical Standards

To resolve this issue, seminaries must:

Establish and enforce a unified statement of faith.

Require all teachers and students to agree and live by it.

Emphasize discipleship, not just academics.

Foster accountability, mentorship, and discipline.

Reject compromise and worldly influence in curriculum and culture.

As Paul instructed Timothy, “Study to shew thyself approved unto God… rightly dividing the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15). A seminary must be a place where truth is upheld, not negotiated.

ONLINE DIGITAL EDUCATION...

NOTHING IS SO FAR TO LEARN ABOUT GOD AND HIS WORDS.